Re: squid-2.4 time?

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:59:20 +0800

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> There are quite many SEGV reported on the mailing-lists still, including
> for PRE-STABLE2.

Are they affecting everyone, or just a small portion of the
target system space? (Ie an older libc, someone trying to do
threads under FreeBSD, etc..)

adrian

>
> /Henrik
>
>
> Duane Wessels wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ARe there any *critical bugs* ? I've briefly looked at the
> > > bugzilla site and there isn't anything really criticial
> > > thats showing up..
> > >
> > > I think its about time we just bit the bullet and rolled out
> > > squid-2.4STABLE1. Then we can deal with the evilnesses people
> > > find, and work towards making squid-2.4STABLE2 (or 5 :)
> > > rock stable.
> >
> > Sounds like there are no big issues left, so I'll tag and tar
> > today or tomorrow....
>

-- 
Adrian Chadd		"The fact you can download a 100 megabyte file
<adrian@creative.net.au>  from half way around the world should be viewed
			    as an accident and not a right."
					-- Adrian Chadd and Bill Fumerola
Received on Sat Mar 17 2001 - 03:59:26 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:38 MST