Re: bug 23 http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23

Probably, but Duane has that bug, and there is not enough information in
the bug report to tell if it is a bug or not...

--
Henrik
Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> I think this should be closed off, or at least marked as "feature"
> instead of "auth".
> Rob
> 
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23
> 
> Description: Opened: 2000-09-13 08:46
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> 
> Client = not important (it's on all clients, though, I only use
> Win-clients)
> Squid Version = 2.3STABLE4
> 
> Problem = caching of javascripts as e.g. in the url-field give errors.
> If I
> don't use the cache, I don't have a problem. If I use it, the script is,
> OR
> very slow, OR gives errors ;(
> 
> Thx
> Mark
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From Duane Wessels 2000-11-09 16:39 -------
> 
> Perhaps the aslk.be site is confused because requests
> are coming from the proxy, which may have a different IP
> address than the browser that executes the java script.
> 
> Squid doesn't treat java script in any special way.  Its all
> just bytes to Squid.