Re: [PATCH] SBufList

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:29:11 -0700

On 12/03/2013 12:49 AM, Francesco Chemolli wrote:

> As this patch is a cherrypick of lp:~squid/squid/stringng, I'm not
> extracting the Makefile.am changes as it's too time-consuming. These
> changes are present in the branch Makefile.am and will be included at
> the final merge time, but are not really significant for review, are
> they?

They are not, but a reviewer sometimes actually tests the patch. I know
it sounds crazy, but it does happen once in a while. You have actually
warned about the missing Makefile changes in your original submission,
but I forgot that caveat after so many emails on the thread. Sorry!

Since those exact Makefile changes would need to be done to trunk during
commit, I am guessing you exclude them now to save time if the patch
needs to be adjusted and re-posted for review, right? I am _not_ asking
for those changes to be included in the patch. Just trying to understand
your motivation or workflow. Not important.

Cheers,

Alex.
Received on Tue Dec 03 2013 - 16:29:32 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 03 2013 - 12:00:11 MST