Re: Cache traffic - odd?

From: Redfern Ian <RedfernI@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 15:58:00 +0100

Could this be due to frame size and fragmentation? If your FDDI is 4Kb
packets, your Ethernet 1500 and your SLIP less, you need fewer packets
for FDDI, and at 58 bytes per packet TCP/IP/Ethernet overhead...

Ian Redfern (redferni@logica.com).
Received on Fri Sep 05 1997 - 10:03:25 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bill Wichers: "Re: Cache traffic - odd?"
Previous message: Jordan Mendelson: "RE: Windows, yeeuch"
Maybe in reply to: Leigh Porter: "Cache traffic - odd?"
Next in thread: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: Cache traffic - odd?"
Reply: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: Cache traffic - odd?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:36:56 MST