Steve Snyder wrote:
> Actually I have read (on this list?) that 254 is a better count for the ext2
> filesystem. Something about the number of 4KB pages being less than that
> used for a 256 dir cache. Am I misinformed?
True, but the performance difference should be quite small. Anyone care
to run some benchmarks so we get some figure?
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hacker -- To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.htmlReceived on Thu Jan 04 2001 - 15:34:54 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:57:20 MST