RE: RE: [SQU] ANNOUNCEMENT: Squid 2.3 STABLE 4 native port for NT update

Hi,

>Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:26:29 +1000
>From: Tony Melia <Tony.Melia@downsmicro.com.au>
>To: "Squid-Users (E-mail)" <squid-users@ircache.net>
>Subject: RE: [SQU] ANNOUNCEMENT: Squid 2.3 STABLE 4 native port for NT upd
> ate
>Message-ID: <20D3153CA972D211A56C0008C74CE05D756B95@the-shadow.downsmicro.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="windows-1252"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>Has anybody done testing to see speed differences between squid for NT and
>squid for Unix tunning on same HW?
>
>Regards,
>TM

I think that the Unix version performs better, because the code is not
optmized for the Windows NT platform, and because the x86 Unix
implementations (Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, etc.) have better performance
than the Microsoft OS on the same HW.

The question must be: "is Squid ported on Windows NT better than MS Proxy
?" ......

Best Regards

Guido Serassio

-
=======================================================
Serassio Guido
Via Albenga, 11/4 10134 - Torino - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.610749
E-mail: serassio@interfree.it
            serassio@libero.it
WWW: http://serassio.interfree.it

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html