Re: [squid-users] Slow cache

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:50:31 +0100

> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I'd recomend using bigger disk cache - for accomodating week's traffic you
> > should have 30GB cache imho. Tuning up filesystem may help too, using xfs
> > or reisersfs (with notail option) on cache disk and probably use dedicated
> > cache drive.

On 05.01 14:44, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> Nope... The book - "Squid - the definitive guide" shows that ext3 is
> still faster then reiserfs.
>
> Search the archives for the bit which I wrote and quoted from the book

I remember that this was mentioned some time ago here. I just do not
believe it for now. Maybe if I'll do my own tests, or if someone will make
tests I would trust...

does the book SHOW that ext3 is the best, or does it SAY that it's the
best? :)

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Boost your system's speed by 500% - DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.*
Received on Wed Jan 05 2005 - 01:50:35 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Mar 07 2005 - 12:59:35 MST