Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tis, 2008-11-18 at 21:14 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> Do you have the same 64/32 bit settings and --with-large-files on both
>> builds?
>
> Didn't we make the cache and swap.state format large-files independent
> in Squid-3?

Not 3.0 that I know of.
Certainly not different between stable9 and stable10.

The only piece of s10 that touched the filesystem would have possibly
reduced files being saved with negative lengths. Not added unreadable
files anywhere.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE10
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.2