RE: [squid-users] Tiered Squid proxy issue (Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80040e57'

From: Ryan McCain <Ryan.McCain_at_LA.GOV>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:16:17 -0600

I tried upgrading to 2.6 on one of the nodes of a POP cluster and it didn't work. To further troubleshoot this, I'm going to attempt to upgrade to 2.7 on one of the POP cluster nodes.

Ryan McCain
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Email: ryan.mccain_at_la.gov
Phone: 225.505.3832

Registered Linux User #364609

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan McCain [mailto:Ryan.McCain_at_LA.GOV]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:21 PM
To: 'Henrik Nordström'
Cc: 'squid-users_at_squid-cache.org'
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Tiered Squid proxy issue (Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80040e57'

BTW, Websense does support Squid 2.6. Would upgrading from 2.5 to 2.6 possibly help?

Ryan McCain
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Email: ryan.mccain_at_la.gov
Phone: 225.505.3832

Registered Linux User #364609

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Nordström [mailto:henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:37 AM
To: Ryan McCain
Cc: 'squid-users_at_squid-cache.org'
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Tiered Squid proxy issue (Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80040e57'

tor 2010-02-11 klockan 11:22 -0600 skrev Ryan McCain:

> We are using Squid 2.5 on SLES for compatibility reasons with a redirector we use at the POP level , Websense. Websebse doesn't support 2.7 or 3.x.

Any external helpers (url rewriters, auth etc) which works with 2.5 also works in later releases.

> Anyways, if you go to http://www.garymallon.com --> COURSES --> DISCUSSION BOARD then login with:
> User: student
> Pw: ssw
>
> I get the following error:
>
> Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80040e57'
>
> The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add. Try inserting or pasting less data.
>
> /mrengmal/gm/forum/inc_func_common.asp, line 585

This is difficult to answer without knowing the web server application.

Have you tried talking to the maintainers of that forum?

A guess is that they are storing the X-Forwarded-For header in their database for tracking purposes and have assigned to small field with for storing that..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Feb 18 2010 - 19:16:34 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 19 2010 - 12:00:06 MST