Re: [squid-users] Question about refresh_pattern and TCP_MEM_HIT

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:12:10 +1200

On 19/09/2012 6:51 p.m., Silamael wrote:
>
> Ok, so if a response contains valid headers concerning caching, these
> are taken instead of using the matching refresh_pattern? So, if i want
> some URLs being served completely without caching, i have to use cache
> deny, right?

Yes. Exactly so.

Amos
Received on Wed Sep 19 2012 - 08:12:24 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jaime Gomez: "Re: [squid-users] Weird issue with Chrome"
Previous message: Fran Márquez: "[squid-users] High load problem with a broken client (Nokia app)"
In reply to: Silamael: "Re: [squid-users] Question about refresh_pattern and TCP_MEM_HIT"
Next in thread: Silamael: "Re: [squid-users] Question about refresh_pattern and TCP_MEM_HIT"
Reply: Silamael: "Re: [squid-users] Question about refresh_pattern and TCP_MEM_HIT"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 19 2012 - 12:00:04 MDT