Re: [squid-users] squid performance of 2.4 much worse than 2.2 and 2.3?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>
To: "Klavs Klavsen" <ktk@metropol.dk>
Cc: "Gary Shelton" <omega996@mac.com>; <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid performance of 2.4 much worse than 2.2 and
2.3?

> Squid-2.2.STABLE5-hno is proven quite fast..
>
> Squid-2.3 has some problems.. especially in it's async_ufs/asyncio
> implementation.
>
> Squid-2.4 fixes most

i do agree that 2.2 and 2.3 are faster than 2.4 based on the metrics that i
have. one interesting bug in 2.4 that doesnt exist in 2.2 or 2.3 is the
multicast icp.

> Squid-2.5 is told to be quite okay.. but there is no hard proofs yet.
> There is a Backeoff starting today, and then we will see how it
> compares...

when we gonna see this results?

fooler.
Received on Mon Nov 12 2001 - 22:35:03 MST